|
Bordeaux Futures, Wine
auction
Classification of the wine growing regions in 2006 |
Bordeaux 2006 by regions (relative average
scores) |
|

click on the chart to enlarge
|
|
Average Scores of all Estates within a Region
The
above chart represents the average of the scores for all the
Bordeaux wineries,
by wine growing region (AOC
in French). The districts are compared in relative to the best region
on a 100 points scale. For more details on a specific chateau,
please use our "Wine Search" engine at the right hand's side of each
page. This tool is extremely useful to pick the best wines for
Bordeaux Futures offerings and wine auctions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bordeaux 2006 - A fine but irregular vintage.
Weather conditions in 2006
|
|
Especially up to harvest and during
the harvest, the weather in 2006 was miles away from being
advantageous for all districts in Bordeaux. Winter 2006 was
relatively calm and with moderate temperatures. However, March
2006 was the rainiest month in 30 years, while April and May
experienced moderate rainfall and quite high temperatures for
spring. June was unusually dry and hot, so flowering went
quickly and as scheduled, and without any issues at all. Until
the end of July, 2006 vintage looked like it would repeat last
year’s astonishing success, but then problems began creeping in.
August was the coldest month compared with last 20 years
average, without much sun and very little rain. September
started with very hot, sunny and humid weather, followed by ten
rainy days. And then came sunshine and hot weather again for the
remaining days of September. October was unstable and mixed from
the very beginning sunshine and rain.
(Izak
Litwar)
|
|
|
|
Harvest and Winemaking in 2006
|
|
The bud-burst was delayed and
spun-out by the cold night-time temperatures of April. Some had
burst around 1st-2nd, others not until 18th or so. Late budding
need not mean a lower quality vintage. But the implication now
was that we were likely going towards a traditional style.
It is at this time that the embryo bunches can be approximately
counted, and it quickly became clear that the yield was not
going to be very big, just like in ’02 and ’03. During this
laborious budding period, there was a localised frost on the
morning of 11th April. It was not a very significant frost, but
was just one more factor towards the naturally low yield of the
2006.
May began and continued regularly quite warm with the vines
nicely watered by heavy showers on 8th and 9th. The flowering
started with a bang, accelerating as the temperature increased
into a heat-wave. It was quickly over in the 30°+ totally fine
weather up to 15th June. There was some “coulure”
caused by the cold end-of-May nights on the early Merlots and
whites, estimated at around 20%, but in the end was not cried
over too much as it seemed to aerate the bunches even more and
to be a further contribution to the naturally low yield of the
year, making costly crop-thinnings even less necessary.
June, with its six thunder-storms ranged from totally dry in the
Médoc to only half the normal in Sauternes. By now, the Spring
rainfall had been absorbed. The vines looked great, but the
grass by the side of the roads was going yellow. The second half
of June remained resolutely dry, apart from fvery localised
storms which only really brought any water to Graves, Sauternes
and the
Entre-Deux-Mers, the rest of the region, especially the
Médoc, remaining totally dry. And temperatures, although
slightly less than the first half, remained resolutely in the
upper 20s. Bordeaux was bracing for another arid Summer.
The main feature of July was just pure heat and drought. The
month’s mean temperature was a massive 4°C over the 85-year
average. The heat-wave started right from 1st July with a
two-day blast of 35°C. It then “cooled” to the high 20s for
seven days, after which it resumed for 19 consecutive days, the
longest heat-wave on record (August ’03 had been “only” 13 days,
’76: 15 days). What is the effect of early heat? Before the
grapes have changed colour, they are not yet able to build up
sugar in the same way that they would in a hot August, and some
even say that only the skin-tannins can be transformed at this
stage.
Then, as from 1st August, the entire situation changed. The high
pressure subsided, allowing a whole series of weak depressions
to come in over Europe, not producing much rain, just a series
of dull, drizzly, cool days. And that was the way the whole of
August would turn out to be. The effect on the bunches was very
obvious. The grapes swelled from the tiny hard berries they had
been at the end of July, especially after the locally heavy rain
of 27th - 29th August. From now on, rot was to be never far
away. In the space of a month, the mood had gone from making
another ’05 to saving the vintage. It was now essential to get
some good dry weather.
Just like in ’96, the change of month brought a dramatic change
of weather conditions, with the Azores high pressure system
ballooning out over Europe and bringing warm air into the
region. Temperatures immediately spiralled from the low 20s to
the 30s, creating the hottest series of September days since the
scorcher year 1921!
Some early Pessac-Léognan whites had started their harvest at
the end of August. Most started now in these first fabulous days
of September and most had finished by the time the weather
changed on 11th. This dry white harvest came in regularly ripe,
with little rot, good sugar levels and nicely refreshing
acidities. It was felt this would be a banner year for dry
whites.
Now it was time for the red harvest to start. The early-ripened
estates, especially in Pomerol and the Graves, harvested their
Merlots the week of 11th, most of the St Emilion and Médoc
Merlots the following week of 18th. Alas, the high pressure
system chose this critical time to subside and allow a series of
storms and fronts to come through. This rain was just too much,
ripening the Merlots without concentrating them and pinching
their tannins. It also obliged many estates to harvest Merlots
that were just short of optimum phenolic ripeness. Some of the
Merlots continued to be picked well into the improving weather
of the month’s end, and some of the Right Bank habitual
late-pickers, by dint of their exceptionally manicured
vineyards, managed to push through even to early October. But
generally, it was a race against time to get the Merlot harvest
in before it rotted, followed quickly by some rapidly
deteriorating Cabernet Francs around 25th. Strangely, it was not
the deeper gravel soils that escaped the rot risk the most. The
heavier clay soils seemed to do better, a real exception to the
rule.
Now it was time to think about the Cabernet Sauvignons. Of
course, they had swelled in August, but had nicely
re-concentrated early September. Most wineries had planned to
start on Monday 2nd October but several didn’t want to take the
risk and considered they were ripe enough anyway, and started in
the warm sunshine of the last week of September. The first week
of October continued fair and relatively warm with night-time
temperatures down as a safeguard, so the main body of the Cabs
could come in at a comparatively leisurely pace during the whole
week.
It was during this week also that Sauternes enjoyed its best
botrytis. Most Sauternais had finished their harvest by now,
with a very satisfactory third and sometimes fourth “trie”,
whilst others continued through the adequately fine second week
of October to produce decent but not the best musts of the
vintage.
(Winedine)
|
|
|
|
Winemega's conclusions
|
|
Our classification shows that the
Pomerol appellation was the most successful region this
year. The average scores for all the properties (39) of the
Pomerol area reached a record average figure of 90.6 pts
surpassing any past record. Is this observable fact due to the
increased quality of the wines or to a widespread scoring
inflation phenomenon within the critics?
The other excelling appellation in 2006 is Saint-Julien
for which its now legendary steadiness is once again rewarded.
These areas are closely followed by
Pauillac and
Pessac-Leognan.
Saint-Emilion
produced some of the best wines in 2006, but the region's
overall performance seem somewhat irregular.
Saint-Estephe
and Margaux
presented very fine wines too, but the overall results of these
areas are somewhat inconsistant. By and large, the performance
for Medoc, Listrac,
Moulis, Haut-Medoc and other
Satellites Right bank areas,
although showing excellent results, are slightly below of the
general average.
|
|
TOP
|
2006 Bordeaux grade inflation? |
|
In 2006,
114 wineries have recorded average grades above 90! Such an abundance of
"stratospheric" scores has never been noted before! Here's a comparison
of the evolution of the number of average grades with 90+ and 95 points
or more over a ten years period (1997-2006):
|
| |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
| >90 |
28 |
41 |
26 |
24 |
21 |
22 |
56 |
34 |
52 |
114 |
|
Proportion (%) |
10.3 |
14.1 |
8.4 |
7.3 |
6.4 |
6.6 |
16.5 |
9.9 |
14.9 |
32.8 |
| >95 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
It also
should be noted that the standard deviation of the scores measuring the
divergences between the critics is particularly low in 2006. This means
that a broad consensus was found on the quality of the reviewed wines.
Finally, is 2006 an exceptional year for Bordeaux? Does this result
really indicate that the number of great quality wines has dramatically
increased due to new winemakers, better viticulture techniques and
better equipment? Or are the critics globally more indulgent than they
were only 5 or 10 years ago? These issues will remain open until we form
our own opinions glass in hand! |
|
|
|
The Score effect
|
|
For more details, please refer to the
TOP Price to Quality picks and to our stastistical
analysis on actual and predicted prices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Style of the vintage
|
|
Dry White Wines
Conditions were perfectly suited to the production of dry white
wines: the cool weather in August preserved the acidity which is
so important to maintain the fresh, zesty character of these
wines, while the burst of September heat ripened the grapes
beautifully. The wines are concentrated, aromatic, beautifully
structured and as exciting as we have seen for many years.
Sauternes - Barsac
Not quite such good news for the sweeter white wines however.
Sauternes, as in 1997, has been battling to eliminate the
“aigre” bad rot, grapes and even bunches that had gone beery
after the wine-flies, which love such hot damp conditions, had
punctured the skins and sent the juice volatile. A first trie
during the early September fine weather was mostly to clean out
inappropriate grey rot, though various subsequent pickings
through to early October yielded some good
botrytis. Overall however the wines tasted
en primeur do not show the exceptional qualities of 2001,
2003 and 2005.
Red Wines: Right Bank
The early parts of the Right Bank - such as Cheval Blanc and the
gravel plateau of Pomerol - had to choose whether to pick their
merlot before the rain when perhaps not quite
physiologically ripe, or to risk waiting. The best decision may
have been to do a bit of both, and there are some very fine
wines here to prove the point. The later parts of the
Right Bank which had to wait until after the rain were less
successful. Without considering 2006 a great vintage throughout
the Right Bank in the 1998 mould, there are some individual
wines which do belong alongside 1990, 1995 and 2000.
Red Wines: Left Bank
The Médoc merlots were a little more affected by the late
September rains, so most chateaux used them as the mainstay of
their second labels. The
cabernets survived the mid September showers and were ripe
for picking at the very end of the month and during the first
week of October. They proved to be very exciting where they
ripened sufficiently and producers were meticulous about
excluding anything substandard. The other crucial key to quality
in 2006 lies in what has been selected for the grand vin. Many
chateaux on the
Left Bank
are declaring a notably small percentage of the crop, and with a
much higher percentage of cabernet than usual - thus only 45% of
the crop has made it into Château Margaux 2006 which has 90%
cabernet in the blend. The figures for Latour (38% Grand Vin and
86% cabernet) tell the same story. Stylistically the wines do
not have the rounded style of recent fine vintages but refer
back to the more classical structure as such as 1986 and 1988.
Red Wines : Pessac Léognan
A Merlot vintage for the Right Bank, a cabernet vintage for the
left - so where did that leave the vignerons of Pessac-Léognan?
They are firmly of the opinion that it is a cabernet vintage,
even though they were also able to pick their merlot in good
conditions. The cabernets were often stunning enabling fine and
well balanced wines to be made. A very good year for this
district of Bordeaux
(Berry Bros & Rudd)
Winemega's precise and mathematical
approach
provides
the most objective wine picking recommendations in total independence.
.
Charles Wyplosz and Alain Bringolf for Winemega.com |
|
|
|
Thanks to the following Contributors for their comments on the
vintage:
- Tony Le Ray Cook
- Izak
Litwar
- Simon Staples
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related topics
Bordeaux
2006 - TOP absolute classification
Coming soon: Bordeaux
2006 - TOP Quality to Price picks by region
Bordeaux 2006 harvest
Our strategies
to subscribe to Bordeaux futures
Advanced
wine topics - by Lauriann Greene-Sollin
The
French statistical alternative solution to Winemega
|
|
|
|
|
|